ONU encontra sem teto vítimas do sonho americano da casa própria

Reportagem publicada no site do jornal The Guardian, que inclusive foi manchete nesta quinta-feira!

UN investigator accuses US of shameful neglect of homeless

UN special rapporteur says wealthy US ignoring deepening homeless crisis while pumping billions into bank rescues

Chris McGreal in Los Angeles – Thursday 12 November 2009 15.12 GMT

Homeless man in California

A homeless man in California. Photograph: Justin Sullivan/Getty Images

A United Nations special investigator who was blocked from visiting the US by the Bush administration has accused the American government of pouring billions of dollars into rescuing banks and big business while treating as “invisible” a deepening homeless crisis.

Raquel Rolnik, the UN special rapporteur for the right to adequate housing, who has just completed a seven-city tour of America, said it was shameful that a country as wealthy as the US was not spending more money on lifting its citizens out of homelessness and substandard, overcrowded housing.

“The housing crisis is invisible for many in the US,” she said. “I learned through this visit that real affordable housing and poverty is something that hasn’t been dealt with as an issue. Even if we talk about the financial crisis and government stepping in in order to promote economic recovery, there is no such help for the homeless.”

She added: “I think those who are suffering the most in this whole situation are the very poor, the low-income population. The burden is disproportionately on them and it’s of course disproportionately on African-Americans, on Latinos and immigrant communities, and on Native Americans.”

Rolnik toured Chicago, New York, Washington, Los Angeles and Wilkes-Barre, a Pennsylvania town where this year the first four sheriff sales – public auctions of seized property – in the county included 598 foreclosed properties. She also visited a Native American reservation.

The US government does not tally the numbers but interested organisations say that more than 3 million people were homeless at some point over the past year. The fastest growing segment of the homeless population is families with children, often single parents. On any given night in Los Angeles, about 17,000 parents and children are homeless. Most will be found a place in a shelter but many single men and women are forced to sleep on the streets.

Los Angeles, which is described as the homeless capital of America, has endured an 18-fold increase in housing foreclosures. Evictions from owned and rented homes have risen about tenfold, with 62,400 people forced out last year in Los Angeles county.

Welfare payments are not enough to meet the rent, let alone food and other necessities. A single person on welfare living in Los Angeles receives $221 (£133) a month – an amount that hasn’t changed in a decade. The rent for one room is typically nearly double that.

Rolnik said that while she saw difficult conditions in all the places she visited, the worst was on the Native American reservation of Pine Ridge in South Dakota.

“You see total hopelessness, despair, very bad conditions. Nothing I have seen in other cities compared to the physical condition of the housing at Pine Ridge. Nothing compared to the overcrowding. They’re not visible, they’re isolated, they’re far away. They’re just lost,” she said.

Rolnik says that one of the greatest matters of shame is that the US has the resources to provide decent housing for everyone.

“In the US, it’s feasible to provide adequate housing for all. You have a lot of money, a lot of dollars available. You have a lot of expertise. This is a perfect setting to really embrace housing as a human right,” she said.

Rolnik has given a verbal report to the US state department, which has a month to respond to her observations. She will submit a final written report to the UN human rights council early next year.


UN meets homeless victims of American property dream

From New York to LA: UN human rights expert tours US hearing from subprime crisis victims

A home advertised for sale at a foreclosure auction in California

A home advertised for sale at a foreclosure auction in Pasadena, California. Photograph: Reed Saxon/AP

There were not many people packed in to the Los Angeles “town hall” meeting who had heard of the foreign woman with the unfamiliar title who had come to listen to their tales of plight. But many took it as a good sign that she had worried the last American government enough for it to keep her out of the country.

Deanne Weakly was among the first to the microphone. The 51-year-old estate agent told how a couple of years ago she was pulling in $80,000 (£48,000) a year from commissions selling homes in LA’s booming property market.

When the bottom fell out of the business with the foreclosure crisis, she lost her own house and ended up living on the streets in a city with more homeless than any other in America. She was sexually assaulted, harassed by the police and in despair.

She turned to the city and California state governments for help. “No one wanted to listen. They blame you for being homeless in the first place,” she said.

Others followed, recounting in English or Spanish, sometimes Korean, their personal crises. Some shouted their anger, others laboriously recounted details of losing homes, families forced into overcrowded shelters, life on the streets.

The United Nations special rapporteur, Raquel Rolnik, listened to it all patiently, occasionally taking notes, nodding encouragement.

Rolnik had waited more than a year to tour cities across the US to prepare a report for the UN’s human rights council on America’s deepening housing crisis following the subprime mortgage debacle.

UN special rapporteurs are more often found investigating human rights in Sudan and Burundi or abuses of the Israeli occupation than exposing the underbelly of the American dream. George Bush’s administration blocked her visit, finding itself in the company of Cuba, Burma and North Korea in blocking a special rapporteur.

“I was asking for almost a year before I as allowed in,” Rolnik said.

When Barack Obama came to power she was welcomed to range across America talking to those who have lived on the streets for years and the newly homeless forced out by the foreclosure crisis.

Rolnik, a Brazilian urban planner and architect, said administration officials were genuinely interested in what she might find, if not embracing of her raison d’etre that everyone is entitled to a decent home.

“One of the first meetings I had at the state department they clearly told me: here, adequate housing is not a human right,” she said.

“I was shocked when I realised that the US, and countries in Europe – England – as well, had a solid housing policy for many years that worked pretty well. That was dismantled and the situation became worse throughout the nineties. Then we had this financial crisis and a real crisis in housing. It’s all tied together,” she said.

“But I didn’t expect to see what I have seen. In some ways the situation is worse than I expected.”

Rolnik travelled from New York and Chicago to New Orleans and South Dakota’s Native American reservations, talking to the homeless, the desperate, the foreclosed, and the officials who run housing policy.

Her final stop was Los Angeles, the homeless capital of the nation. Up to 100,000 people are sleeping on the streets or in shelters on any given night. Some have been living like that for years. Others found themselves suddenly destitute as the bank seized their home or they lost a job and couldn’t pay the rent.

Two years ago about 1,300 people were evicted from properties in central LA. Last year it was 15,500. Across the wider Los Angeles region 62,400 people were thrown out of their homes.

“There is a predictable path for those who lose their jobs and can’t pay the rent or the mortgage,” Gary Blasi, a University of California law professor, told Rolnik. “First they live with friends and relatives, but they’re poor, too. Then they live in their cars until the cars get towed or break down. Some live in tents. Almost all the camping grounds within 100 miles of Los Angeles are now filled with people living in them.”

A single person on welfare living in Los Angeles receives $221 a month – an amount that hasn’t changed in a decade. The rent for one room is typically nearly double that. Too often the newly destitute end up on the streets.

“I had a job as a cashier in K-Mart and shared a house with other women,” Deborah Burton told Rolnik. “But then I lost my job and when you lose your job you lose your home. You can’t pay the rent.”

Burton, 57, found herself sleeping on the streets. She explained how the tents go up on Skid Row in central LA after dark but must be down before dawn.

“If you aren’t up and moving by 6am, the police arrest you for sleeping or sitting on the sidewalk. It goes on your record and makes it very difficult to get [public] housing,” she said. “Not many think of us as people. Don’t criminalise us because we find ourselves in a certain situation. No one wants to be homeless.”

Doris Tinson certainly doesn’t but she is on the brink of losing the house she bought in 1964 for $29,000. She paid off the mortgage several times as she borrowed against the house to supplement her pay as a nurse and send her children, and then grandchildren, to college.

Then a few years ago, a man came knocking offering her a cheap mortgage, a fraction of the value of the house by then put at $750,000. Tinson took out the $87,000 loan but along the way the monthly payments quadrupled to $2,324, nearly her entire income and they are set to rise again.

“The mortgage went up because the interest rate went up. I still don’t know how that happened,” she told Rolnik.

On Los Angeles’ own Wall Street, in the poorer, mostly black and Hispanic, south of the city, the “for sale” signs hang outside the boarded and secured foreclosed homes with warning notices against trespass. On average homes have lost two-thirds of their value in south central LA.

At the end of 2008 about 2% of Los Angeles homes had been foreclosed on. Housing activists told Rolnik that was mostly because of sharply increasing unemployment and predatory lending that exploited the vulnerable.

Rolnik takes it all in. Later she describes herself as disturbed that a country so rich is in many ways so deficient and indifferent in dealing with its poor and vulnerable.

She says that the more recent conservative philosophy of dismantling the old policy of providing affordable housing to those with smaller incomes in favour of the illusion that everyone can, and should, buy their own home played a central role in not only creating the housing crisis but the financial one.

“Part of the financial crisis has to do with these housing policy options because one of the main ideas of this policy is to promote home ownership to those who never got access to property. People who never had credit finally had banks provide them credit and they can buy a home. But it didn’t work for the poor.

“So now we have a new face of homelessness – people who had homes, were not living in public housing, were not living in assisted housing, but now are in a position of asking for assistance because they’re homeless. But the public housing has been destroyed,” she said.

Rolnik held a town hall meeting in every city she had visited. Always they were packed.

At the Los Angeles meeting, the queues quickly form at the three microphones.

Toni Matthews has been homeless for nearly nine years. “I wrote to Washington but nobody ever answered,” she said.

A Spanish-speaking veteran of the Korean war steps up. He is the angriest of the lot. He is not a communist, he says, but in Cuba nobody goes homeless. He fought for America and now he is left to live on the streets.

Others tell of being evicted by unscrupulous landlords, of living in dangerous and filthy buildings and how the city council doesn’t force landlords to obey the law. The frustration is mixed with a sense of powerlessness.

“Anyone can end up in this situation, living on the streets. Don’t imagine it can’t happen to any of you,” shouted a man.

Away from the microphone, Deanne Weakly says she had never heard of a UN special rapporteur but she’s glad Rolnik turned up.

“I am grateful for the spotlight on the homeless. The spotlight of attention on what people don’t think exists here. These people have no voice. They’re afraid. Not everyone has a big mouth like me,” she said.

Deborah Burton thinks it is a shameful reflection on America that Rolnik should be in the US.

“America is one of the richest countries in the world. For me as a citizen and a person of colour I think it’s important to let the rest of the world know what’s going on here,” she said.

“American politicians come and listen but they don’t do anything. The question we have to answer is why this has been going on so long.”

Rolnik doesn’t pretend she can change the situation. All she can do, she tells the crowd at the meeting, is to draw their problems to the attention of their government and warn others of the dangers.

“The US has exported an economic model with the idea that everyone can organise themselves under that model. It’s very important for the rest of the world to know who fits in to this model and who is excluded,” she tells her audience.


4 comentários sobre “ONU encontra sem teto vítimas do sonho americano da casa própria

  1. Being one of the people the United States has so conveniently swept aside, I hope that you’re able to actually spur them into action. My fear is that they will acknowledge the problem, talk about solutions and accomplish NOTHING. Our government here in the USA is big on talk and small on solutions. It takes them forever to accomplish anything, and then the solution isn’t even appropriate for the problem.

    For example, I was injured in a car accident a year ago. I cannot work. I have paid into Social Security all my working life, and am entitled to draw on that fund now that I’m disabled. However, one must go through the process of applying for aid. Approval can easily take months, or even YEARS. In the interim, the applicant is left unable to work or pay bills. But if you can’t put gas in the car (or afford the mandatory insurance fees, or pay for public transportation, or pay for a taxi, or whatever) and stop seeing doctors, or miss a hearing for your application, your application for aid will simply be denied. It’s a lose-lose system designed to toss the poor and/or injured aside like so much refuse.

    They need to establish some kind of interim aid paid out to people while they wait for their cases to be reviewed. They need to make sure the amounts are sane and reasonable and in line with the cost of living today (not the cost of living in 1948). They need to implement something NOW, not 6 months from now, not a year from now, not 6 years from now. TODAY. There are people starving for lack of food, dying for lack of medical care, people FAR worse off than I am. I, at least, have a friend who lets me use a spare room at his house. He can’t afford to feed me, and can’t pay for my transportation costs to and from my doctor visits, but at least I’m not freezing in the cold outside. It would be nice to have a couple hundred a month so I could eat or put gas in the car and meet my appointments, but I’m making do somehow with nothing. So far. Next month may be a different story. Next month might be too late for someone else, too.

    Maybe you should tell the US that in front of the UN: “Next month might be too late for someone. Next year WILL be too late for someone.”

    Maybe someone needs to shake our government until they wake up and realize that their glacial pace is killing the most fragile of its own citizens.

    PS. Feel free to contact me if you’d like to discuss the matter from my perspective. I’m educated, well-read and outspoken. Up until my car accident I was a member of the ‘middle class’ in America. So I know all too well how easily our system discards those it deems undesirable. I’d be happy to contribute to your research and report in whatever way I can.

  2. Jeff – I do know what it is like to be homeless and unemployed. I do read the desperatness in your post and the hopelessness that there is no one to turn to. The reality is that the US government does not care about espically those that are disabled, but about its own citizens in trouble. This should have been noted by the international community when Hurricane Katrina hit and that US government appeared slow to help its own people. Instead, we see the international community continue to exempt the US from the devolping human rights standards that the rest of the world demands of nations’ good governence standards.

    Housing, food and health care are rights in other devolped nations, often called “social rights.” They are also measures of good governence, as “good governence” is not just about democraticly stable, national institutions. How can we call a nation “rich” and respectful of basic human rights when it engages in the criminal-like neglect of of millions of its own citizens. A responsible nation that is being governed well takes care of the food, housing and health needs of its own people when they are in need, the best they can.. Even poor nations usually want to take care of their own people, but it is obvious that the US has no finical shortcoming to use as an excuse.

    This effort on the part of wonderful activist and the United Nations is a good start, as we need international help to put the pressure on the US government to take responsibility for its own people. American domestic NGOs that often deal with issues of homelessness, poverty and the like, often do not seek advocate “overseas” and such advocacy with international NGOs may help only a little. American activists must learn to reach out to “overseas” advocates!

    One other international organization that could help is the Euroepan Union. The EU is a force for stetting the standards for good governenve. It also has various relationships with the US. There should be a partnership between the EU and the UN to confront the US about it lack of good governence and get it to responsibly care for its own people in need. The EU has formed pertnership with nations like Russia, Isreal, the Palenistian Authority, Latan American countries, where human rights and good governence are demanded. It is time the EU and UN confront the corrupt and bad governence of the US, and take its responsibility to take care of its people.

    The international community should find as offensive the idea that the “richest nation on Earth” should be allowed to be exempt from standards of human rights, good governence and criminal negect of its own people who are traped without homes, food and health care. Americans must come to understand that homelessness and destute poverty are violations of human rights and are not an acceptable condition. No – this cannot wait any longer!

    Good Governance Practices for the Protection of Human Rights –OHCHR – http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Publications/GoodGovernance.pdf

  3. Não se meta em problemas que não são seus. Não dê palpite na casa dos outros. Se você é professora aqui, volte a dar aulas, que é o seu trabalho no serviço público.

    • José,
      Fico muito orgulhosa como professora brasileira pela oportunidade de estudar a condição de moradia em outros países, e acho que isso pode ser de extrema valia para meus alunos brasileiros.

Deixe um comentário

Preencha os seus dados abaixo ou clique em um ícone para log in:

Logotipo do WordPress.com

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta WordPress.com. Sair /  Alterar )

Foto do Google+

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Google+. Sair /  Alterar )

Imagem do Twitter

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Twitter. Sair /  Alterar )

Foto do Facebook

Você está comentando utilizando sua conta Facebook. Sair /  Alterar )


Conectando a %s